There may be a little way to go before we get a PR 'peasants' revolt' over the content and news agenda of PR Week, but after stating my belief that PR Week was incestuous and too London/big agency-centric, my comments have been supported by a variety of PR professionals. Let's examine the evidence:
The influential PR blogger, Stuart Bruce, commented on my blog:
"I agree with your criticism about PR Week's over reliance on covering big firms. ... They also have a distinct London bias.
It was no[t] always so and ten years ago PR Week was much more balanced and much, much better at covering small firms and the regions."
Meanwhile, in an entirely separate debate about the benefits of membership to the UK's PR industry body, the Chartered Institute of PR, another voice spoke-up:
"I'd like to know why you all find PR Week so useful...is n't it about what other PR cos [sic] are doing, client wins etc?"
And finally... a couple of adulatory letters to PR Business, the new (but so far, highly rated - apart from its website) PR trade magazine, indicate that PR Week may have a fight on its hands. A selected excerpt from the letters' page includes:
"Great work! - How refreshing for the PR industry to have a magazine that covers news and issues of real importance to business ... I cannot be the only PR professional who has tired of reading who is doing what to whom and does not care whether some old pro is thinking of coming back to PR from teaching."
I'll keep my eyes out for any further grassroot murmurings.... Wouldn't it be good if, by starting a debate as to what practitioners really want from their industry magazines, we could help shape the printed press for the better!
Hi Simon
You get an idea of what PR Week is about. They have not responded to your post in any forum I can find.
It is not identifying with the comments of the UK PR bloggers who have a very different agenda.
But then it is a publication that hides behind firewalls and subscriptions.
It is all very 'Old PR'.
If you want to know how old - just look at the Haymarket New Communication conference - all command and control.
Hezza is well out of date.
Posted by: David Phillips | May 09, 2006 at 12:05 PM
You're right David and I agree with your past post about the conference.
It seems PR Week/Haymarket is paying lipservice to the changes, but not going the full distance.
Or.... being a media institution it may just be taking its time getting around to taking it all on board.
Posted by: Simon | May 09, 2006 at 04:05 PM